Activity-Related Incentives as Motivators in Open Innovation Communities
نویسندگان
چکیده
Many companies are using open innovation projects to create new and innovative ideas. Individuals who engage in open innovation usually participate voluntarily and without monetary rewards. What motivates these individuals and how can their motivation be increased? In two studies, the authors identify activityrelated incentives as crucial. The authors find that achievement-related incentives and, with some limitations, power-related incentives positively correlate with optimal motivation, flow experience, and self-reported behaviour, when voluntarily working with an open innovation software platform. The authors conclude that open innovation projects should focus on activity-related incentives to enhance participants’ motivation for open innovation and their flow experience. an actual organisation, business, or company in order to function (Möslein & Neyer, 2009). At the same time, Chesbrough (2003, 2006) describes open innovation as the classical counterpart of closed innovation, where innovation takes place only in highly protected research and development (R&D) labs within companies without any contact to the outside world (Möslein & Neyer, 2009). Another term often used in this context is crowdsourcing, introduced by Howe (2006). Crowdsourcing includes voluntary participation from people DOI: 10.4018/ijkbo.2012010102 22 International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations, 2(1), 21-37, January-March 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. with diverse backgrounds in various projects that can be distributed all over the world. Crowdsourcing is based on Web 2.0 technology and is not limited to innovation processes – it is much broader than open innovation. In this article, we use the term open innovation as conceptualised by Chesbrough (2003, 2006). Accordingly, we see open innovation as an approach to creating new ideas, products, or services within organisations. In open innovation, innovative processes unfold beyond the reach of the research and development (R&D) department of a company. Open innovation includes customers, external partners, or non research-related departments of the company (Reichwald & Piller, 2006). Möslein and Neyer (2009) distinguish between three main groups of innovators: (1) core innovators from the company’s R&D division, (2) peripheral innovators (including all employees from a company whose main tasks are not related to innovation), and (3) external innovators such as clients, user, or suppliers. When organisations start using open innovation, they often begin with integrating external innovators in their innovation processes. A typical example is open source software development – a special case of open innovation – such as the operating system Linux (Hertel, Niedner, & Herrmann, 2003) and the User-to-User-Support for the server software Apache (Lakhani & von Hippel, 2003). However, more and more companies have begun to use open innovation projects and integrate customers or other external innovators into the process of value creation beyond open source software (i.e., Bartl, Füller, Schmidt, & Rieger, 2010; van Delden, 2010; Steinhoff, 2009). Neyer, Bullinger, and Möslein (2009) point out that besides including external innovators into the innovation process, it is very important to also focus on peripheral innovators within the company. Companies such as Siemens (Eberl, 2009), IBM (Bungart & Köhler, 2009), or Swarovski (Erler, Rieger, & Füller, 2009) have already implemented open innovation projects, which integrate peripheral innovators who often participate voluntarily and without monetary rewards (Schattke & Kehr, 2009). Accordingly, the general question of this article focuses on what motivates peripheral innovators to participate in open innovation projects and which incentives they perceive for doing so. In the classical approach to motivation, the interaction between person and situation leads to motivation, which, in turn, leads to behaviour (Lewin, 1946; Rheinberg, 2008b). In this framework, the term person refers to individual differences, such as implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities (Kehr, 2004). A motive is a recurrent concern with a certain class of incentives, such as achievement-, power-, or affiliation-related incentives (McClelland, 1987). People with a high achievement motive strive for excellence. People with a high power motive strive for having impact or influence on others. Lastly, people with a high affiliation motive strive for establishing and maintaining positive relations with others (i.e., McClelland, Koestner, & Weinberger, 1989; Schattke, Koestner, & Kehr, 2011; Schultheiss & Brunstein, 2010). The term situation incorporates stimuli, cues, and incentives provided by the environment, in particular achievement-, power-, and affiliation-related incentives. The term motivation denotes the “activating orientation of current life pursuits toward a positively evaluated goal state” (Rheinberg, 2008b, p. 15). The compensatory model of motivation and volition distinguishes between three structural components of motivation, called affective preferences, cognitive preferences, and subjective abilities. When all three structural components are activated and aligned, one is optimally motivated and likely to experience flow (Kehr, 2004). The difference between motivation and motives is that “motivation” refers to a current state whereas “motive” refers to a relatively stable preference for certain classes of incentives. The arousal of a motive through fitting incentives leads to motivation (Rheinberg, 2008b). It is important to note that incentives can either be purposerelated (Heckhausen & Rheinberg, 1980) or activity-related (Rheinberg, 1989). 15 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/activity-related-incentivesmotivators-open/61426?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Library Science, Information Studies, and Education. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
منابع مشابه
Knowledge Management in Railway Industry: A Conceptual Model Based on Open Innovation and online Communities
Organizations need to be capable of attracting external knowledge. This activity is extremely related to innovation process and particularly to open innovation approach. Therefore, this qualitative research is designed to identify the dimensions and components for providing a conceptual model of KM architecture by open innovation approach based on online communities in the grounded theory frame...
متن کاملEvaluation of Effective Motivators and Barriers of Physical Activity in the Elderly
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine barriers and motivators of physical activity in older adults. Methods & Materials: In this cross sectional study 153 older adults were participated through classified randomized clustering method. The questionnaires were completed in face to face interview. Descriptive statistics and U Mann Whitney test were used to analyzing data. Re...
متن کاملThe Crowding Effect Of Rewards On Knowledge-Sharing Behavior In Virtual Communities
Knowledge sharing is an important activity in virtual communities (VC). Recently, some researchers have explored various motivators that may influence VC members' contribution. Although providing rewards has been found to significantly motivate employees to share knowledge in organizational research, it also has been found to diminish intrinsic motivation and lead to reduced efforts in in some ...
متن کاملApplication of evolutionary computation techniques for the identification of innovators in open innovation communities
Open innovation represents an emergent paradigm by which organizations make use of internal and external resources to drive their innovation processes. The growth of information and communication technologies has facilitated a direct contact with customers and users, which can be organized as open innovation communities through Internet. The main drawback of this scheme is the huge amount of in...
متن کاملDistributed Cooperation and Property Rights in the Commons
The networked medium of the Internet lowers the technical barriers for distributed collaboration and peer production, however the challenges of creating and sustaining large social and cooperative enterprise are immense. This paper is a survey of prior literature and current theories of cooperation and property rights, particularly in the context of distributed online communities. The recent Op...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- IJKBO
دوره 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012